Drude model parameters to fit the dielectric function
of free electron metals including plasma frequencies and damping constants for
silver (Ag), aluminum (Al), gold (Au), copper (Cu),
potassium (K), sodium (Na), platinum (Pt)
Drude model parameters to fit the dielectric function
of free electron metals including plasma frequencies and damping constants for
Ag, Al, Au, Cu, K, Na, Pt
Metal | plasma [eV/cm-1/PHz] | damping [meV/cm-1/THz] | source |
---|
Ag | 9.6*/77430/2.321 | 22.8*/183.9/5.513 | Blaber |
---|
| 9.013/72700*/2.18 | 18/145.2*/4.353 | Ordal |
---|
| 9.04*/72920/2.186 | 21.25*/171.4/5.139 | Zeman |
---|
| 8.6*/69370/2.08 | 45*/363/10.88 |
Hooper |
---|
Al | 15.3*/123000/3.7 | 598.4*/48.27/144.7 | Blaber |
---|
| 14.75/119000*/3.57 | 81.8/660*/19.79 | Ordal |
---|
| 12.04*/97110/2.911 | 128.7*/1038/31.12 | Zeman |
---|
Au | 8.55*/69000/2.068 | 18.4*/148.4/4.449 | Blaber |
---|
| 9.026/72800*/2.183 | 26.7/215*/6.46 | Ordal |
---|
| 8.89*/71710/2.15 | 70.88*/571.7/17.14 | Zeman |
---|
| 9*/72590/2.176 | 70*/564.6/17.71 | Berciaud |
---|
| 8.951/72200/2.165 | 69.1/557.4/17.94 |
Grady |
---|
| 7.9*/63720/1.91 | / / |
Kreiter |
---|
Cu | 7.389/59600*/1.914 | 9.075/73.2*/8.34 | Ordal |
---|
| 8.76*/70660/2.118 | 95.5*/770.3/23.09 | Zeman |
---|
K | 3.72*/30000/0.8896 | 18.4*/148.4/4.449 | Blaber |
---|
Na | 5.71*/46100/1.381 | 27.6*/222.6/6.674 | Blaber |
---|
| 5.93*/47830/1.434 | 380*/3065/91.89 | Zeman |
---|
Pt | 5.145/41500*/1.244 | 69.2/558*/16.73 | Ordal |
---|
The respective source values are indicated by a star.
Conversion between different units performed by using
Spectroscopic Unit Converter
In order to avoid any confusion, the above values in cm-1 correspond
to the so-called wavenumber=1/lambda, i.e. a direct inverse of the wavelength without 2\pi prefactor. The above values in Hz correspond
to the ordinary frequency, i.e. not to the radial frequency
given in rad/s.
Do you also wonder why the experimental data are so much scattered?
You are not alone! Some differences in the data may be accounted for
by differences in samples preparation. Yet the differences in the data
appear to be too big to be explained merely by the differences in
samples preparation. Let me know, please, if you find a satisfactorily
explanation.
Recipes so that films with optimal optical properties
can be routinely obtained have recently been
provided by Norris et al.
[9].
They also quote that: "due to inexperience with deposition methods, many
plasmonics researchers deposit metals under the wrong conditions, severely
limiting performance unnecessarily.
This is then compounded as others follow their published procedures."
Some data on graphene layers you can find in Ref.
[10]
For other not necessarily metallic or plasmonic materials see
refractiveindex.info
and
Luxpop Index of refraction values.
Note in passing that unless you are cautious,
your calculations based on using a Drude fit in the region
where the real part of experimental dielectric constant is between
approximately -10 and zero may not even be qualitatively correct!
The region (where the real part of experimental dielectric constant is between
approximately -10 and zero) is rather narrow region
with a relatively little weight
in an overall Drude fit, which stretches down to the values
of the real part of dielectric constant below of -10**4.
A Drude fit is, by its very definition,
optimized for frequencies (wavelengths) lower (larger) than a plasma
frequency (wavelength) and thus not so much concerned in the region
where the real part of dielectric constant is in the proximity of zero.
Consequently the latter
can be significantly shifted compared to the real material data.
By that I mean more than hundreds of nanometers!
Do you want an example?
Whereas a Drude fit to the silver data employs a plasma
frequency of 9.6 eV (wavelength 129 nm), the experimental material
data exhibits zero of the real part of silver dielectric function at
approximately 328 nm, what makes a difference by a factor higher than 2.5!
Unfortunately, the region
where the real part of dielectric constant is between
approximately -10 and zero
is the most
interesting region from the view of plasmonics and
various plasmonic applications. You may try to replace the plasma
frequency (wavelength) in that region by the frequency (wavelength)
which corresponds to zero of the experimental real part of
dielectric function, as I did in
in Ref. [11].
But then you face the problem that
a Drude fit yields typically much smaller slope of the real part of
the dielectric function compared to experimental data.
Consequently in the visible
and near infrared you might arrive at contradicting
conclusions when using a Drude fit to the metal data instead of true
experimental data!
A spectacular example has been provided
in Ref. [12], where
photonic band structure of two-dimensional metallic and
metallo-dielectric photonic crystals was calculated. It has
been demonstrated there that
on using a Drude fit to silver data, an optimal lattice
structure with the largest complete photonic band gap (CPBG)
was a square lattice,
whereas on using experimental silver data, an optimal lattice structure
with the largest CPBG turned out to be a triangular lattice.
(An additional information can be found
here.)
The reason
behind the above behavior was that CPBG width turned out to be
sensitive to the slope of the
dielectric constant in the proximity of zero. One can verify that
a Drude fit yields typically much smaller slope of the real part of
the dielectric function compared to the true
experimental data in the proximity of zero of the real part.
In the case of small nanoparticles, the so-called
surface
scattering correction
to a free-electron metal dielectric function, also known as
a free path effect,
has to be taken into account, resulting in the so-called
size-corrected dielectric function [13].
Importance of the size correction to a metal dielectric function in
describing the non-radiative rates near the dipolar surface plasmon resonance
has been recently discused in
Read more about the surface scattering corrections
here.
REFERENCES
-
M. G. Blaber, M. D. Arnold, and M. J. Ford,
Search for the Ideal Plasmonic Nanoshell:
The Effects of Surface Scattering and Alternatives to Gold and Silver,
J. Phys. Chem. C 113(8), 3041-3045 (2009) (see
compilation from different sources in Table 1 therein).
-
N. K. Grady, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander,
Influence of dielectric function properties on
the optical response of plasmon resonant metallic nanoparticles,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 399(1-3), 167-171 (2004)
-
M. H. Hider and P. T. Leung,
Nonlocal electrodynamic modeling of fluorescence characteristics
for molecules in a spherical cavity,
Phys. Rev. B 66, 195106 (2002).
-
I. R. Hooper and J. R. Sambles,
Dispersion of surface plasmon polaritons on short-pitch metal gratings,
Phys. Rev. B 65, 165432 (2002).
-
M. Kreiter, S. Mittler, W. Knoll, and J.R. Sambles,
Surface plasmon-related resonances on deep and asymmetric gold gratings,
Phys. Rev. B 65, 125415 (2002).
-
M. A. Ordal, R. J. Bell, R. W.
Alexander, Jr., L. L. Long, and M. R. Querry,
Optical properties of fourteen metals in the infrared and far infrared:
Al, Co, Cu, Au, Fe, Pb, Mo, Ni, Pd, Pt, Ag, Ti, V, and W,
Appl. Opt. 24, 4493-4499 (1985)
(see
compilation from different sources in Table 1 therein).
- E. J. Zeman and G. C. Schatz,
An accurate electromagnetic theory study of surface enhancement factors
for silver, gold, copper, lithium, sodium, aluminum,
gallium, indium, zinc, and cadmium,
J. Phys. Chem. 91(3), 634-643 (1987) (see
compilation from different sources in Table 1 therein).
- A. D. Rakic, A. B. Djuric,
J. M. Elazar, and M. L. Majewski,
Optical Properties of Metallic Films for Vertical-Cavity
Optoelectronic Devices,
Appl. Opt. 37(22), 5271-5283 (1998).
(They presented
models for the optical functions of 11 metals
used as mirrors and contacts in optoelectronic and optical devices:
noble metals (Ag, Au, Cu), aluminum, beryllium, and transition
metals (Cr, Ni, Pd, Pt, Ti, W). The values for the respective plasma
frequencies are summarized in Table 1 therein; the remaining
Lorentz-Drude model parameters are summarized in Table 2 therein.)
-
K. M. McPeak, S. V. Jayanti, S. J. P. Kress, S. Meyer,
S. Iotti, A. Rossinelli, and D. J. Norris,
Plasmonic Films Can Easily Be Better: Rules and Recipes,
ACS Photonics 2(3), 326-333 (2015).
-
M. Bruna and S. Borini,
Optical constants of graphene layers in the visible range
Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(3), 031901 (2009).
- A. Moroz, Three-dimensional complete photonic bandgap structures
in the visible,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5274-5277 (1999).
[Demonstrated for the first time
the possiblity of a complete photonic bandgap (i.e. common for
both polarizations and for all propagation directions) in a
3D fcc lattice of metallic spheres embedded in a dielectric matrix.]
- H. van der Lem and A. Moroz, Towards two-dimensional complete
photonic-bandgap structures below infrared wavelengths,
J.
Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2, 395-399 (2000) [pdf].
- A. Moroz, Electron mean-free path in a spherical shell geometry,
J. Phys. Chem. C 112(29), 10641-10652 (2008).
(The article has been supplemented with a detailed
Electronic Supporting Information. See also an accompanying F77 code fsc.f
to calculate the mean-free path for various model cases discussed in the article.)
[
Refreshing some of plasmonic headlines
]
[
Basic properties of
localized surface plasmon resonances
]
[
Negative refractive index material
headlines long before Veselago work and going back as far as to 1904...
]
[
Selected Links on Photonics,
Photonic Crystals, Numerical Codes, Free Software
]
[
Back to Main page
|
Full list of my scientific publications
|
My most frequently cited articles
]
Alexander Moroz
August 16, 2009 (last updated on April 15, 2019)